Current year-to-date ( YTD ) data is through May 2020.

Exports: Textile material bags for packing goods

Textile material bags for packing goods, the No. 616 export by value totaled $13.06 million for the month of May, $61.73 million through May of 2020, and $137.09 million for all of 2019, the latest annual data available, according to U.S. Census Bureau data analyzed by WorldCity. Need more details? Read more

Click on any of the countries in the chart below to gain access to the specific exports and imports between that country and (port), how it compares to other ports for trade with that country, how that trade has changed over time, and much more. Data available both by value and tonnage. Download data. If you are not a subscriber, you can learn more by clicking on the subscribe link.

Top Markets

RankCountryYTD
1Mexico$29.52 M
2Canada$8.9 M
3Dominican Republic$3.55 M
4Costa Rica$3.41 M
5Ireland$1.81 M
6Vietnam$1.61 M
7Switzerland$1.36 M
8Singapore$1.32 M
9Brazil$1.16 M
10India$1.1 M
Data loading...

U.S. exports of Textile material bags for packing goods increased 10.69 percent through May to $61.73 million

U.S. exports of Textile material bags for packing goods increased 10.69 percent from $55.76 million to $61.73 million through the first five months of 2020 when compared to the same period the previous year, according to WorldCity analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data.

The category ranked 616 through May among the roughly 1,265 export commodity groupings as classified by Census. It ranked No. 665 for the last full year with a total value of $137.09 million, a $17.28 million, 14.42 percent increase from the 2018 total.

Through May of this year the leading sources were No. 1 Mexico, No. 2 Canada, No. 3 Dominican Republic, No. 4 Costa Rica and No. 5 Ireland. The leading gateways were No. 1 Otay Mesa Freeway Border Crossing, Calif., No. 2 Port Laredo, No. 3 El Paso Border Crossing, Texas, No. 4 empty and No. 5 Pharr International Bridge in Texas.

In the last previous full year, the leading sources were No. 1 Mexico, No. 2 Canada, No. 3 Dominican Republic, No. 4 Costa Rica and No. 5 Norway. The leading gateways were No. 1 Otay Mesa Freeway Border Crossing, Calif., No. 2 Port Laredo, No. 3 El Paso Border Crossing, Texas, No. 4 Pharr International Bridge in Texas and No. 5 Port of New York.

Looking at specific airports, seaports and border crossings, the top five through through the first five months of the year were:

Highlights for the top five ports:

  • Otay Mesa Freeway Border Crossing, Calif. fell 5.53 percent compared to last year to $7.48 million.
  • Port Laredo fell 8.32 percent compared to last year to $6.92 million.
  • El Paso Border Crossing, Texas fell 3.65 percent compared to last year to $5.3 million.
  • empty totaled $3.84 million. The previous year, there were no exports in this category.
  • Pharr International Bridge in Texas rose 6.21 percent compared to last year to $3.47 million.

There are several hundred airports, seaports and border crossings that handle international trade; they are, in turn, part of the roughly four dozen U.S. Customs districts.

Highlights for the top five foreign markets:

  • U.S. exports from No. 1 Mexico increased $6.77 million, 11.53 percent, (105.99 percent market share).
  • U.S. exports from No. 2 Canada increased $2.95 million, 16.54 percent, (33.63 percent market share).
  • U.S. exports from No. 3 Dominican Republic increased $1.97 million, 30.86 percent, (13.55 percent market share).
  • U.S. exports from No. 4 Costa Rica increased $1.32 million, 29.47 percent, (9.39 percent market share).
  • U.S. exports from No. 5 Ireland increased $978,945, 30.94 percent, (6.71 percent market share).

All totaled, 76.22 percent of all these Textile material bags for packing goods exports from the United States were shipped from the top five markets through May of this year. That is equal to $104.49 million of the $137.09 million total.

All totaled, 43.77 percent of all these Textile material bags for packing goods exports to the United States were shipped to the top five Ports through May of this year. That is equal to $27.02 million of the $61.73 million total