Current year-to-date ( YTD ) data is through March 2020.

Imports: Abrasive powder on textile material

Abrasive powder on textile material, the No. 428 import by value totaled $48.72 million for the month of March, $147.7 million through March of 2020, and $593.71 million for all of 2019, the latest annual data available, according to U.S. Census Bureau data analyzed by WorldCity. Need more details? Read more

Click on any of the countries in the chart below to gain access to the specific imports and imports between that country and (port), how it compares to other ports for trade with that country, how that trade has changed over time, and much more. Data available both by value and tonnage. Download data. If you are not a subscriber, you can learn more by clicking on the subscribe link.

Top Sources

RankCountryYTD
1Mexico$38.83 M
2Canada$31.47 M
3Germany$14.59 M
4South Korea$9.91 M
5China$9.29 M
6Finland$7.39 M
7Italy$4.43 M
8United Kingdom$4.25 M
9Switzerland$4.24 M
10Japan$3.62 M
Data loading...
January – March 2020

Top Ports

Total Trade: $147.7 million

RankPortTotal YTD
1Port of Newark $22,268,407
2Port Laredo $17,308,622
3Detroit Ambassador Bridge, Mich. $12,144,123
4Port of Los Angeles $11,672,255
5Port Huron Blue Water Bridge, Mich. $10,749,292
6Otay Mesa Freeway Border Crossing, Calif. $10,034,770
7El Paso Border Crossing, Texas $7,629,765
8Pharr International Bridge in Texas $7,329,191
9Port of Charleston $6,942,982
10Port of Virginia $6,155,454

U.S. imports of Abrasive powder on textile material increased 4.17 percent through March to $147.7 million

U.S. imports of Abrasive powder on textile material increased 4.17 percent from $141.78 million to $147.7 million through the first three months of 2020 when compared to the same period the previous year, according to WorldCity analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data.

The category ranked 428 through March among the roughly 1,265 import commodity groupings as classified by Census. It ranked No. 460 for the last full year with a total value of $593.71 million, a $15.09 million, 2.48 percent decreased from the 2018 total.

Through March of this year the leading sources were No. 1 Mexico, No. 2 Canada, No. 3 Germany, No. 4 South Korea and No. 5 China. The leading gateways were No. 1 Port of Newark, No. 2 Port Laredo, No. 3 Detroit Ambassador Bridge, Mich., No. 4 Port of Los Angeles and No. 5 Port Huron Blue Water Bridge, Mich..

In the last previous full year, theleading sources were No. 1 Mexico, No. 2 Canada, No. 3 Germany, No. 4 China and No. 5 South Korea. The leading gateways were No. 1 Port of Newark, No. 2 Port Laredo, No. 3 Port of Los Angeles, No. 4 Detroit Ambassador Bridge, Mich. and No. 5 Otay Mesa Freeway Border Crossing, Calif..

January – March 2020

Top Countries

RankCountryTotal YTD
1Mexico $38,826,570
2Canada $31,472,606
3Germany $14,585,106
4South Korea $9,912,147
5China $9,286,483
6Finland $7,392,487
7Italy $4,426,031
8United Kingdom $4,247,775
9Switzerland $4,235,525
10Japan $3,615,005

January – March 2020

Top Districts

RankDistrictTotal YTD
1Laredo $7,610,350
2Detroit $7,545,319
3New York City $6,497,292
4Chicago $4,292,618
5Los Angeles $3,504,760
6Cleveland $3,289,105
7El Paso $3,018,744
8San Diego $2,492,146
9Charleston $2,306,368
10Buffalo $1,353,898

Looking at specific airports, seaports and border crossings, the top five through through the first three months of the year were:

Highlights for the top five ports:

  • Port of Newark rose 10.99 percent compared to last year to $22.27 million.
  • Port Laredo rose 2.21 percent compared to last year to $17.31 million.
  • Detroit Ambassador Bridge, Mich. rose 10.38 percent compared to last year to $12.14 million.
  • Port of Los Angeles rose 3.15 percent compared to last year to $11.67 million.
  • Port Huron Blue Water Bridge, Mich. rose 17.89 percent compared to last year to $10.75 million.

There are several hundred airports, seaports and border crossings that handle international trade; they are, in turn, part of the roughly four dozen U.S. Customs districts.

Highlights for the top five foreign markets:

  • U.S. imports from No. 1 Mexico increased $4.55 million, 13.28 percent, (26.29 percent of all shipments).
  • U.S. imports from No. 2 Canada increased $1.8 million, 6.07 percent, (21.31 percent market share).
  • U.S. imports from No. 3 Germany decreased $3.93 million, 21.25 percent, (9.88 percent market share).
  • U.S. imports from No. 4 South Korea increased $265,425, 2.75 percent, (6.71 percent market share).
  • U.S. imports from No. 5 China decreased $1.51 million, 13.95 percent, (6.29 percent of all shipments).

All totaled, 70.47 percent of all these Abrasive powder on textile material imports to the United States were shipped from the top five markets through March of this year. That is equal to $104.08 million of the $147.7 million total.

All totaled, 50.2 percent of all these Abrasive powder on textile material imports to the United States were shipped to the top five Ports through March of this year. That is equal to $74.14 million of the $147.7 million total