Current year-to-date ( YTD ) data is through June 2020.

Imports: Leather further prepared after tanning

Leather further prepared after tanning, the No. 1056 import by value totaled $569,147 for the month of June, $7.8 million through June of 2020, and $28.88 million for all of 2019, the latest annual data available, according to U.S. Census Bureau data analyzed by WorldCity. Need more details? Read more

Click on any of the countries in the chart below to gain access to the specific imports and imports between that country and (port), how it compares to other ports for trade with that country, how that trade has changed over time, and much more. Data available both by value and tonnage. Download data. If you are not a subscriber, you can learn more by clicking on the subscribe link.

Top Sources

RankCountryYTD
1South Africa$2.92 M
2Brazil$1.13 M
3Colombia$568,512
4Taiwan$503,844
5Mexico$425,593
6Italy$343,598
7Pakistan$282,515
8South Korea$222,446
9Australia$213,212
10Indonesia$171,290
Data loading...

U.S. imports of Leather further prepared after tanning decreased 49.29 percent through June to $7.8 million

U.S. imports of Leather further prepared after tanning decreased 49.29 percent from $15.37 million to $7.8 million through the first six months of 2020 when compared to the same period the previous year, according to WorldCity analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data.

The category ranked 1056 through June among the roughly 1,265 import commodity groupings as classified by Census. It ranked No. 1001 for the last full year with a total value of $28.88 million, a $109,960, 0.38 percent decreased from the 2018 total.

Through June of this year the leading sources were No. 1 South Africa, No. 2 Brazil, No. 3 Colombia, No. 4 Taiwan and No. 5 Mexico. The leading gateways were No. 1 Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, No. 2 Miami Int’l Airport, No. 3 Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, No. 4 Port of Los Angeles and No. 5 Port of Newark.

In the last previous full year, the leading sources were No. 1 South Africa, No. 2 Colombia, No. 3 Brazil, No. 4 Pakistan and No. 5 Mexico. The leading gateways were No. 1 Miami Int’l Airport, No. 2 Los Angeles International Airport, No. 3 John F. Kennedy International Airport, No. 4 Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport and No. 5 Houston Int’l Airport.

Looking at specific airports, seaports and border crossings, the top five through through the first six months of the year were:

Highlights for the top five ports:

  • Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Texas fell 56.65 percent compared to last year to $3.04 million.
  • Miami Int’l Airport fell 51.04 percent compared to last year to $763,242.
  • Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport fell 3.8 percent compared to last year to $751,818.
  • Port of Los Angeles rose 30.18 percent compared to last year to $746,881.
  • Port of Newark fell 2.27 percent compared to last year to $379,963.

There are several hundred airports, seaports and border crossings that handle international trade; they are, in turn, part of the roughly four dozen U.S. Customs districts.

Highlights for the top five foreign markets:

  • U.S. imports from No. 1 South Africa decreased $4.3 million, 59.53 percent, (37.48 percent market share).
  • U.S. imports from No. 2 Brazil increased $90,456, 8.68 percent, (14.53 percent market share).
  • U.S. imports from No. 3 Colombia decreased $1.39 million, 70.98 percent, (7.29 percent market share).
  • U.S. imports from No. 4 Taiwan increased $11,860, 2.41 percent, (6.46 percent market share).
  • U.S. imports from No. 5 Mexico decreased $119,464, 21.92 percent, (5.46 percent market share).

All totaled, 71.23 percent of all these Leather further prepared after tanning imports to the United States were shipped from the top five markets through June of this year. That is equal to $5.55 million of the $7.8 million total.

All totaled, 72.86 percent of all these Leather further prepared after tanning imports to the United States were shipped to the top five Ports through June of this year. That is equal to $5.68 million of the $7.8 million total